Skip Navigation
 

Seedless Watermelon Trial at Three Locations in Missouri

Tim Reinbott, David Trinklein, and Sanjun Gu
University of Missouri Columbia and Lincoln University

Project Summary
Seedless, triploid, watermelons are gourmet items that command high prices at both retail and wholesale markets. The recent surge in demand for locally grown vegetables has made the production of seedless watermelon attractive for small growers throughout Missouri. Traditional production of watermelons in Missouri involve regions with deep, sandy soils characteristic of alluvial areas near the two major rivers in our state. Indeed, yield estimates of most varieties of seedless watermelons are based on these soil conditions. Data concerning the performance of the seedless varieties on claypan soils characteristic of a goodly part of Missouri is sparse.

Project Approach
In the summer of 2009, a study was conducted to evaluate the performance of 15 seedless watermelon varieties at three sites in Missouri. The varieties evaluated included Amarillo, Buttercup, Harmony, Imagination, Indiana, Lamar, Matrix, Melody, Millenium, Palomar, Seedway 4502, Sugar Coat, Sugar Crisp, Sweet Delight, Triple Threat and Troubadour. Tests plots were located on the Bradford Research and Extension Center near Columbia, MO; the Carver Research Farm near Jefferson City, MO; and the Toby Detwieller farm near Lamar, MO.

Seeds were started in a greenhouse in a peat-lite germination medium and transplanted into the field on June 15th at the Lamar location and June 16th at the Columbia location. Plants were established on raised beds covered with black polyethylene plastic for weed and moisture control. Prior to transplanting the soil was amended with 80 pounds of actual nitrogen, 46 pounds of P2O5 and 60 pounds of K2O per acre. Four plants along with two pollinators were included per replication and each variety was replicated four times in a randomized manner. Plants were spaced two feet apart within rows spaced 10 feet apart. When warranted, supplemental irrigation was supplied via drip irrigation using polyethylene tape under the plastic mulch. At the Lincoln University site watermelon seedlings were transplanted in mid June and harvested in early September but data is not included because excessive rainfall in August severely reduced yield and quality.

Harvest was conducted on August 21 at the Lamar location and September 9th at the Columbia location. Data collected included total fruit number, average fruit weight, yield per plant, and sugar content measured as % Brix. The latter was based on two randomly selected fruit per plant from each replication. Data was presented by Dr. Sanjun Gu at the Great Plains Vegetable Conference at St. Joseph in January 2010 and is on the MU Bradford Web Page (http://aes.missouri.edu/bradford).

Goals and Outcomes:
It was our objective to determine if certain varieties of seedless watermelons performed better than others at various locations in Missouri. The data below is the mean of the Columbia and Lamar locations. The Lincoln University location had water logging issues late in the growing season which affected yield and quality and is not presented. At Columbia and Lamar the data was extremely close and we are very confident in the results.

2009 Seedless Watermelon Trial
Variety Location # Fruit Ave. Wgt*. % Brix Yld/plant* Yld/acre**
Amarillo Bradford 43 12.86 11.71%
  Southwest 65 12.39 11.10%
  Average 54 12.63 11.41% 42.6 18.6
Buttercup Bradford 40 13.23 10.80%
  Southwest 50 12.68 11.60%
  Average 45 13 11.20% 36.6 15.9
Harmony Bradford 26 16.48 11.83%
  Southwest 45 15.54 10.00%
  Average 35.5 16.01 10.92% 35.5 15.5
Imagination Bradford 34 11.61 12.14%
  Southwest 50 13.36 12.10%
  Average 42 12.62 12.12% 33.1 14.4
Indiana Bradford 31 13.11 12.63%
  Southwest 40 14.25 12.50%
  Average 35.5 13.68 12.57% 30.4 13.2
Lamar Bradford 42 11.77 12.75%
  Southwest 51 11.65 13.00%
  Average 46.5 11.71 12.88% 34 14.8
Martix Bradford 28 18.19 11.86%
  Southwest 34 17.70 11.90%
  Average 31 17.95 11.88% 34.8 15.1
Melody Bradford 29 13.02 11.72%
  Southwest 33 13.90 12.80%
  Average 31 13.46 12.26% 26.1 11.4
Millenium Bradford 44 12.97 12.53%
  Southwest 51 15.97 12.73%
  Average 47.5 14.47 12.63% 50 21.8
Palomar Bradford 28 14.46 11.95%
  Southwest 48 16.62 11.50%
  Average 38 15.54 11.73% 36.9 16.1
Seedway 4502 Bradford 23 16.42 11.00%
  Southwest 60 15.90 11.60%
  Average 41.5 16.16 11.30% 41.9 18.2
Sugar Coat Bradford 32 17.37 12.89%
  Southwest 37 16.29 11.60%
  Average 34.5 16.83 12.25% 36.3 15.8
Super Crisp Bradford 24 16.07 12.40%
  Southwest 50 16.91 11.30%
  Average 37 16.49 11.85% 38.1 16.6
Sweet Delight Bradford 26 16.93 11.50%
  Southwest 22 15.26 12.00%
  Average 24 16.10 11.75% 24.1 10.5
Triple Threat Bradford 39 12.20 12.84%
  Southwest 40 15.94 11.60%
  Average 39.5 14.04 12.22% 34.7 15.1
Troubadour Bradford 32 11.04 11.34%
  Southwest 38 14.08 11.60%
  Average 35 12.56 11.47% 27.5 12
Mean   38.6 14.58 12% 35.2 15.3
Standard deviation   7.4 1.87 0.56 6.5 2.8
* = In pounds; ** = In tons; based on 5'x10' spacing

Back to top