|
EXPERIMENTAL
PROCEDURES
Four locations were selected to represent the range of conditions found in
the cotton growing area of southeastern Missouri. All locations were
planted on 38" row spacing. Our cooperator's farms are Johnny Hux's farm
near Sikeston (Bosket fine sandy loam soil) and Charles Parker's farm near
Senath (Dubbs silt loam soil). The trials at the Portageville location
were planted at the UMC Delta Center's Lee Farm. Portageville silt trials
were planted on Tiptonville silt loam soil, while the Portageville clay
trial was planted on Portageville Clay. The Clarkton Flex variety trial was
at the Rhodes farm on Bosket fine sandy loam soil.
Field Plot Design: The trials were arranged in a
randomized complete block design with four replications. The plots were
four rows wide and 37 feet long, with the center two rows being used for
yield and other data. Plots were end trimmed to 31 feet in length prior to
harvest, to eliminate end plant effect.
Entries: All producers of cottonseed were eligible to
enter varieties in the 2007 evaluation trials. Participation was voluntary
and no control was exercised by the program over which or how many
varieties were entered. However, to help finance the evaluation programs,
a fee of $350 was charged for each variety entered by the seed producers.
A total of 56 cotton varieties were compared in the Portageville, Sikeston,
and Senath trials in 2007. The Clarkton Flex trial had 43 entries and the
Roundup trial had 34. All varieties are outlined in the following table.
Plot Management: The trials were planted with
commercial equipment modified for small plot work. The off-station trials
were managed during the growing season by the producer/cooperator.
Once-over harvest was completed using a Case IH 2022 picker. The seed
cotton was ginned on a 20-saw Continental micro-gin equipped with an
incline cleaner along with a single stage lint cleaner. The resulting
cotton lint was then analyzed for the fiber quality properties: micronaire,
length, strength, uniformity, color grade and trash percentage.
Data Recorded: Lint yields are reported in pounds of
lint per acre. H.V.I. quality characteristics of the lint were analyzed at
the International Textile Center in Lubbock, Texas and the results are
presented with the yield and other agronomic data.
Fiber Quality: Fiber quality characteristics were
determined for each variety utilizing lint samples from all replications at
each test location. These characteristics and their importance are
described below.
A: Micronaire (Mic): The micronaire test provides a
combined measure of maturity and fineness of cotton fibers. Fiber maturity
is a relative measure of cell-wall thickening. Immature fibers result in
the production of yarns and fabrics with low quality. In the test, air is
passed through a compressed sample of cotton fiber. The rate of flow
through the sample follows a relationship between diameter or thickness of
the textile fibers and the air resistance they provide. Finer fibers
result in greater resistance and therefore, a lesser air flow. Micronaire
values that are very low or very high are undesirable. A low micronaire
implies the fiber is either fine or immature. A high micronaire is
indicative of a very coarse fiber. Value recorded can be interpreted as follows:
- Below 3.6 = fine and often immature
- 3.7 - 4.9 = premium range
- Above 4.9 = coarse fibers
B: Uniformity: Fiber uniformity is a measure of the
degree of uniformity of fiber length in a sample. Uniformity is calculated
as a ratio of the average length of all fibers to the average length of the
longest half of the fibers in the sample. The ratio is then multiplied by
100. High uniformity values are desirable and indicate uniform fiber
lengths.
- Below 77.0 = Very Low
- 77.1 - 79.0 = Low
- 79.1 - 82.0 = Average
- 82.1 - 85.0 = High
- Above 85.1 = Very High
C: Strength: Fiber strength is reported in grams per
tex. A tex unit is equal to the weight in grams of 1000 m. of fiber. The
strength values are reported in grams of force required to break one tex
unit when fibers are held with the jaws separated 1/8 in. The 1/8 in. jaw
spread breaks the fibers at the weak point. High fiber strength enables
the yarn to be spun at a faster rate and produces a stronger yarn. The
following chart categorizes strength readings and aids in the
interpretation of strength values for an 1/8 in. gauge.
- Below 23.9 = Very Low
- 24.0 - 26.9 = Low
- 27.9 - 29.9 = Average
- Above 30.0 = High
D: Length: Fiber length is reported in hundredths of
an inch as measured by a fiber-graph instrument and is the average of the
longest half of the fibers in the sample, upper half mean (UHM). Long
fibers are desirable because they produce greater yarn strength and aid in
spinning finer yarns
- Below 0.97 = Short
- 0.97 - 1.10 = Medium
- 1.11 - 1.28 = Long
- Above 1.28 = Extra Long
E: Elongation: Elongation is the percent of fiber length that
a fiber will stretch or elongate before it breaks. A high elongation is
desirable and indicates that a fiber is not brittle.
F: Leaf: Leaf is the percent of the sample surface area that
is covered by trash particles such as leaf fragments, bark and grass. High
leaf content indicates that the sample will have a high waste content when
spun.
G: Rd: Rd is the amount of light reflected by a sample. A
high reflectance, which is desirable, indicates a bright sample of lint
that is unweathered and undamaged as far as color is concerned.
H: +b: The amount of yellowness in a sample is measured as
+b. Weathering and damaged lint such as caused by insect damaged locks
will cause a high yellowness reading, which is undesirable. Lint that has
a high level of yellowness will require more bleaching than lint that has a
low level. Spots in samples will increase the +b reading.
I: Base price was adjusted for color, leaf, staple,
micronaire, strength, and uniformity. Calculated by the 2007 Cotton Loan
Valuation Program, based on the national CCC loan schedule for 2007.
|