University of Missouri-Columbia
MU Bradford Research and Extension Center
Agricultural Experiment Station
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Map
Driving directions
Portageville, Pemiscot County

Field Day
*Our next field day will be held September 2, 2008.

News

Research

People

Crop & Pest Information

Weather

Contact us
Director:
Jake Fisher
P. O. Box 160
Portageville, MO 63873
Phone: 573-379-5431
Fax: 573-379-5875
Email:FisherJ@missouri.edu

Sulfur Fertilization Of Rice

David Dunn, Soils Laboratory Manager

Sulfur (S) is an essential plant nutrient. In previous years S was delivered free to the farm by rain. Volcanoes and fossil fuel burning power plants release millions of tons of S annually. This S was then brought to earth with rain and snow. While the government cannot regulate volcanoes the EPA has restricted S emissions from fossil fuels. Sulfur deficiencies in rice are increasing each year. The University of Missouri recommends applying S only on soil with a CEC of less than 6.5. This would preclude sulfur fertilization for most rice production fields. This recommendation was developed during the early 1970's and reflects sulfur carried to the soil by rainfall. This study was conducted to evaluate Sulfur fertilization of rice.

Two pre-plant sulfur treatments were compared to the standard nitrogen fertilization for cultivating rice. A pre-plant urea treatment was included to verify if yield differences in the ammonium sulfate (NH4SO4) treatment were due to a sulfur or nitrogen effect. The total amount of nitrogen supplied to each plot was 150 lbs/acre. Nitrogen rates for pre-plant N treatments were balanced by deducting the corresponding N from the pre-flood rate. These treatments are listed in Table 1. Soil samples were collected from each plot at harvest. These samples were analyzed for pH and SO4-S.

The yields for both sulfur treatments were numerically greater than for the urea treatments (Table 1). The average numerical yield advantage for the sulfur treatment was 19 bu/acre. At harvest SO4-S soil test levels for both sulfur treatments were significantly greater than the urea treatments. SO4-S levels for the 90% sulfur treatment were numerically greater than the NH4SO4 treatment. Post harvest SO4-S levels indicate that sulfur build up should not be a problem. Soil pH levels were significantly lower for sulfur treatments at pre-flood. At harvest only the NH4SO4 treatment was significantly different. The NH4SO4 treatment lowered post harvest pH by 0.4 units.

While sulfur pre-plant fertilization did not significantly increase rice yields, the numerical yield advantage (19 bu/acre) for these treatments is compelling. At current prices for ammonium sulfate adding 12 of sulfur per acre (50 lbs NH4SO4) adds $1-$2 per acre to production costs. Rice producers should soil test for SO4-S and consider pre-plant sulfur fertilization for fields testing low.

Table 1. Nitrogen and Sulfur contributions for treatments 2003.
TreatmentPre-plantPre-floodMid-seasonTotal Yield
(bu/acre)
Harvest soil test values
 UreaNH4SO4UreaNH4SO4UreaNH4SO4NSSO4-S
(ppm)
pH
(units)
Standard009000015001692.16.2
NH4SO4012800012150121883.35.8
Urea10080010015001701.95.9
90% Sulfur009000015012*1894.36.0

* Sulfur contribution is from 90% sulfur applied pre-plant.


2004 Field Day Report


The Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station is the research arm of the
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources
at the University of Missouri-Columbia
Site maintained by people at AgEBB

agebb@missouri.edu