University of Missouri-Columbia
MU Forage Systems
Agricultural Experiment Station
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources
Map
Driving directions
Linneus, Linn County

Grazing School

    2009 Brochure

Workshops

Research

Faculty

News

Weather

Contact us

Superintendent
David Davis
21262 Genoa Road
Linneus, MO 64653
Phone: 660 895-5121
FAX: 660 895=5122
Email: DavisDK@missouri.edu

July 1, 1998

Forage Systems Update
Vol 7, No. 3

line

Grazier's Arithmetic

Jim Gerrish

At our May FSRC grazing school we failed to cover the topic of "Grazier's Arithmetic" and I told the attendees that I would cover it in the next newsletter, so here it is. This is basically reproduced from our 1997 Missouri Grazing Manual, but it does draw your attention to the topic. There are several components in a grazing system that can be calculated or estimated. This is an up-front disclaimer that these calculations are basically intended to get ball park estimates to work from. They do not give you "the Answer". We will look at calculating seasonal carrying capacity, grazing period stock density, paddock size, and paddock number.

Seasonal Carrying Capacity: Carrying capacity is the stocking rate which is economically and environmentally sustainable for a particular grazing unit throughout the grazing season. Carrying capacity is largely determined by four factors: 1) annual forage production, 2) seasonal utilization rate, 3) average daily intake, and, 4) length of the grazing season. These terms can be expressed in the mathematical formula below:

              Annual Forage Production  X  Seasonal Utilization Rate
Carrying  =   ------------------------------------------------------
Capacity      Average Daily Intake      X   Length of Grazing season

Annual forage production is the total amount of forage dry matter produced per acre on an annual basis. This would include both hay and pasture harvested from grazed acres. In the formula, this term should be expressed as lbs forage/acre. Seasonal utilization rate is the percentage of the annual forage production which will actually be harvested by the grazing livestock. This will be very dependent upon rotation frequency and expected level of animal performance. Utilization rate is expressed as a unitless decimal fraction in the formula.

Average daily intake should be set at the level that will be required to yield the desired animal performance level. This may well be the most difficult part of the entire process. To accurately determine the appropriate intake value, some estimate of forage digestibility and energy is required. These values cannot be reliably determined without careful forage sampling and laboratory analysis. For this reason we tend to insert arbitrary values in this space and err on the side of overestimating intake. Average forage intake values for high, medium, and low performance of either steers or cow-calf pairs would be 3.5%, 3.0%, or 2.5% as a percentage of the animal's bodyweight. For example a 1200 lb cow of medium milking ability would consume about 36 lb of forage dry matter on a daily basis. In the calculation, intake would be expressed as .03 lb of forage/lb of liveweight. Length of the grazing season is how many days this grazing unit needs to feed the livestock and is expressed as days.

When the appropriate values have been entered into the equation and calculation made, the resulting answer is the pounds of animal liveweight that each pasture acre of the grazing unit will support for the indicated grazing season. As an example, we will assume that an average acre will produce 7600 lbs of forage annually. If we plan to use an average 3 day grazing period the seasonal utilization rate might be around 70 %. The livestock will be steers we hope to have gain 1.5 to 2 lb/hd/day. This would be a moderate performance level, so intake is entered at 3 percent of bodyweight which is .03 lb of forage/lb of liveweight. It is important to enter intake in this format, not as 3 percent so that units cancel out. We will anticipate grazing the steers from April 20 to October 1 or a total of 164 days.

We make the following calculation:

        7600 lb forage/acre  X  .70
 ----------------------------------------  = 1080 lb liveweight/acre
 .03 lb forage/lb liveweight  X  164 days

The 1080 lb liveweight/acre is an indication of the carrying capacity of this unit. If we purchase 540 lb steers, can we stock the unit at 2 steers (1080 lb liveweight/acre ÷ 540 lb/steer) to the acre? Only on the first day of the season! Why? Because the animals are, hopefully, gaining weight every day and quite likely the average forage availability in August is lower than that in May. If expected average daily gain is 1 3/4 lb/hd/day, the average weight of steers at mid-season will be 683 lb (540 lb + (82 days X 1 3/4 lb/day)). Initial stocking rate could be set at 1.6 steers/acre (1080 lb liveweight/acre ÷ 683 lb liveweight/steer). Remember this is a guideline to help make initial stocking decisions not, a magical recipe for universal financial success.

Grazing Period Stock Density: After making basic farm stocking decisions, the time comes for every beginning grazier to make the actual decision of where to place a break fence or how many animals to place in a particular paddock. That decision is based on the same principles used in the carrying capacity equation discussed above but modified to represent single grazing period conditions rather than seasonal values. The carrying capacity equation becomes the stock density equation with the following modifications:

               Available Forage  X  Grazing Period Utilization Rate
   Stock   =   ----------------------------------------------------
   Density     Average Daily Intake  X    Length  of Grazing Period

Available forage is the quantity of forage dry matter that is actually allotted to the animals for a grazing period. Accurately measuring forage availability is time consuming and expensive so we tend to rely on estimations of yield. The simplest method is to look at a pasture and make an educated guess as to what the forage availability is likely to be. With practice, a good grazier can consistently estimate within 10 to 20 % ± the actual yield. A second method relates height and condition of the pasture to dry matter yield. This process was fully described in the April 1997 Forage Update (Vol 6:No. 2) or can be accessed at our website (aes.missouri.edu/fsrc/)

The following example illustrates how to determine where to place a temporary fence to create a paddock to feed a herd of 100 steers weighing 600 lb/hd for 1 day with a rate of gain objective of 2.25 lb/hd/day. The pasture is Orchardgrass-red clover 8-10 inch tall and the area where the steers have just finished grazing has about 20 percent bare ground. The pasture is 40 acres that is 660 ft wide. To use the stock density equation we must first determine the appropriate values.

Forage availability can be estimated from above mentioned height:yield table using the average sward height of 9 inches and the stand condition as good. The corresponding value for an Orchardgrass-legume pasture is approximately 250 lb/acre-inch so the available forage 2250 lb/acre (9 inch X 250 lb/acre-inch).

As an average daily gain of 2.25 lb/hd/day is a high performance objective, utilization can not be excessive or else intake will be limited. To maintain an intake rate of 3.5 percent of bodyweight, a 50 percent utilization rate with one day grazing would be appropriate to use in the calculation. Assuming the 1 day grazing period, we can make the following calculation:


  2250 lb forage/acre   X  .5 utilization rate       31,365 lb
  --------------------------------------------    =  liveweight/acre
   .035 lb forage/lb liveweight  X   1 days

The steers weigh 600 lb/head and each acre will support 31,365 lb liveweight, so the pasture can be stocked at the rate of 52 steers/acre/day (31,365 lb liveweight/acre ÷ 600 lb liveweight/steer). The herd of 100 steers will require 2 acres/paddock (100 steers ÷ 52 steers/acre).

It is very important that values used for the parameters in the equation are realistic in how they relate to one another. All of the parameters are interrelated and inserting an inappropriate value for any one parameter will result in erroneous conclusions. For example if available forage is below 1500 lb/acre, an intake of 3.5 percent would be impossible to achieve. For this reason, the equation cannot be used as most mathematical formulas where if all but one value is known the remaining value can be calculated. A calculation can be made, but the result may be biologically meaningless.


The Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station is the research arm of the
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources
at the University of Missouri-Columbia

Site maintained by people at AgEBB
agebb@missouri.edu