University of Missouri-Columbia
MU Greenley Memorial
Agricultural Experiment Station
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Driving directions
Novelty, Knox County

Field Day
* August 5th, 2014




Variety Testing


Contact us
Kelly Nelson
P.O. Box 126
Novelty, MO 63460
Phone: 660-739-4410

Dual Boom Versus Single Boom Zone Herbicide Application (ZHA) In Field Corn

  William Donald
Research Agronomist, USDA-ARS
Kelly Nelson
Assistant Professor

What is Reduced Rate-Zone Herbicide Application (ZHA)? Reduced-rate ZHA uses: 1) crop management to enhance crop competitiveness with weeds, 2) soil residual herbicide banded over crop rows at reduced rates (Figure 1) and 3) the same herbicide banded between rows at higher rates than in rows, but less than the maximum registered rate. The net result is that ZHA reduces total herbicide use per acre and herbicide input costs for farmers.

What Can Reduced Rate-Zone Herbicide Application Do for Farmers?

  • ZHA reduces total preemergence, soil residual herbicide use and herbicide input costs in competitive field crops without compromising net returns. For example in Missouri research, atrazine + s-metolachlor (e.g., Bicep II herbicide) use in field corn was reduced up to 47%, without reducing net returns.
  • ZHA is best done at planting with special sprayer booms mounted on planter boxes. Cost savings on herbicides with ZHA quickly pay for spray boom construction. Spray boom construction is cheap, and sprayer parts are commercially available. ZHA sprayer calibration is simple.
  • Reduced rate-ZHA of soil residual herbicides makes them be no more costly to farmers than herbicide-resistant GMO crops technology, without technology fees or restrictions on replanting saved seed.
Weed management:
  • ZHA is an additional, alternative way to manage weeds which keeps decision making for weed management in the farmerís control, not commercial custom applicator.
  • ZHA can be used on land with terraces, grassed waterways, or center pivot irrigation
  • ZHA is a generic herbicide application method and can be used with many preemergence, soil residual herbicides in many row crops. It isnít limited only to atrazine + smetolachlor (Bicep II) in corn.
  • ZHA does not require major or expensive change to current weed management and crop production practices.
  • Reduced-rate ZHA may slow selection and evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds.
  • ZHA reduces the chance of herbicide damage to crops.
Herbicide contamination of water and water quality:
  • By reducing herbicide use, ZHA helps reduce herbicide movement in runoff from fields and minimizes the chance of surface and ground water contamination by herbicides.
  • By reducing water contamination by herbicides, public drinking water suppliers donít have the added cost of herbicide cleanup to comply with E.P.A. drinking water standards.
Reduces public fear and keeps herbicides on the market:
  • By reducing reports of atrazine (Aatrex 4 L and numerous commercial herbicide mixtures containing atrazine) and other herbicides in drinking water, ZHA will reduce public fear of drinking water contamination by herbicides.
  • In turn, this may help prevent these herbicides from being banned by government regulatory agencies. Thus, ZHA may help keep some herbicides on the market and available to farmers for weed management.

Even flat spray nozzle tips (all the same) (e.g., Tee Jet TP 4001 E)
Figure 1 Band application
Premergence herbicide is banded over the crop row followed by field cultivation between rows later
This older herbicide spray system was used for banding preemergence herbicides in the 1950ís and 1960ís.
Standard flat spray tip (all the same) (e.g. Tee Jet TP 8002)
Figure 1 Broadcast application
Preemergence herbicide is broadcast both over and between crop rows
This conventional broadcast herbicide spraying system is used now.

In Zone Herbicide Application (ZHA) different herbicide rates are applied between rows (BR) and in row (IR) using even nozzle tips and one spray boom so that the total amount applied is reduced up to 50% compared to broadcast treatments.

Different even flat spray nozzle tips with different output alternate in row and between row (e.g., Tee Jet TP 4001 E in row and TP 4003 E between row)
Figure 1 Zone herbicide application (ZHA)
with premergence herbicide rates between rows greater than in rows so that less total herbicide is applied less than broadcast treatments
This new adaptation of older banding methods has potential to reduce herbicide inputs preemergence treatments up to about 50% without reducing $ returns
Figure 1 Zone herbicide application of preemergence herbicide is best made at planting. Spray nozzles can be attached to planter boxes so that herbicide is applied at different rates in row and between row. This approach means that zone herbicide application can be made on farmland with terraces.

Herbicide is non-uniformly applied relative to the crop row, so that less is applied (up to 50% less) than when broadcast.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A comparison between band, broadcast, and zone herbicide application systems.

In previous research at UMCís Greenley and Bradford research centers, preemergence soil residual herbicides (chiefly, atrazine-metolachlor, as in Bicep II) were equally effective in controlling weeds whether they were broadcast applied or applied using zone herbicide application (ZHA) (i.e., lower rates over rows than between rows). Yields were equivalent with both application methods (equal to the weed-free checks), even though only 50 to 62.7% of the 1X broadcast herbicide rate was applied with zone herbicide application.

Although a dual boom system was used in this earlier zone herbicide application research, a single boom system for zone herbicide application would be mechanically simpler and less expensive. However, a modified calibration procedure would be needed for single boom zone herbicide application. In Feb. , 2002, W. Donald spoke before the advisory board for the Greenley research center. At that time, Rhett Hunziker (RR 1 Box 193, Knox City, MO 63446 (660) 434-5252) first suggested that a single boom ZHA might be feasible.

The characteristics of zone herbicide application with either dual booms or a single boom are compared with standard flat fan broadcast herbicide application in Table 1. The rate of herbicide application with broadcast or dual boom ZHA is determined by herbicide concentration in the spray tank after calibration, and other factors (e.g. carrier volume, speed, etc.) are held constant. Calibration procedures are the same for either broadcast application or dual boom ZHA systems. Coverage should be similar with either application method because they both use one type of nozzle, although there may be a greater chance for coverage problems with improper ZHA (Table 1). In contrast to dual boom ZHA, the herbicide rate for single boom ZHA is regulated by both (a) herbicide concentration and (b) carrier volume of application with different nozzles. Carrier volumes in-row (IR) are less than between row (BR) for single boom ZHA, so coverage will vary in these two row positions. This should not reduce weed control efficacy with PRE soil-residual herbicides. POST translocated herbicides should perform better than POST contract herbicides with single boom ZHA (e.g., glyphosate versus glufosinate) (i.e., less dependence on spray carrier volume and coverage for good efficacy), but this remains to be researched.

Research objectives:
The objectives of this research are to (1) determine whether dual boom and single boom ZHA systems perform alike with PRE soil residual herbicides (e.g., atrazine / metolachlor in corn).
(2) verify that the single boom ZHA has the same advantages over broadcast application as the dual boom ZHA.

This experiment is a repeat of one conducted at Greenley in 2003. Results for the two trials are comparable and successfully establish the objectives of the study.

Table 1. Comparison of reduced rate broadcast versus dual and single boom zone herbicide application.

Characteristics Herbicide application systems for reduced rates
Broadcast application Zone herbicide application
(ZHA where IR = BR zone width)
Single boom ZHA
(One boom, one sprayer system with different even nozzle tips alternating along the boom)
Dual boom ZHA
(Two offset booms at the same height, two sprayer systems with the same even nozzle tips)
In-row (IR) versus between-rows (BR) herbicide rates IR = BR Herbicide rate IR < BR Herbicide rates
Herbicide rate uniform across spray swath YES NO, herbicide rate is a "square wave" pattern across spray swath with higher rates between rows than in rows
Herbicide rate regulated by carrier volume, in part NO, herbicide concentration in the spray tank varied to regulate herbicide rate applied YES, Both herbicide concentration in the spray tank and the nozzle tips varied to regulate herbicide rate applied NO, herbicide concentration in the spray tank varied to regulate herbicide rate applied
Spray volume output per nozzle in relation to row position [Output volume controlled by nozzle, pressure & ground speed] Spray volume equal for all nozzles on one boom IR = BR
(weed spray coverage IR = BR)
Spray volume IR < BR
(weed spray coverage IR > BR)
Spray volume equal for all nozzles on one boom IR = BR (weed spray coverage IR = BR)
Potential range of herbicide rates that can be applied Wide and continuous range is possible Wide, but discrete "stepped" range of rates is limited by the commercial availability of even nozzle tips Wide and continuous range of IR and BR rates is possible
Sprayer modification required NO, One herbicide concentration in one spray tank; calibrated through one type of nozzle on one boom YES, minor modifications of boom; One herbicide concentration in one spray tank; 2 different nozzle tips for IR and BR zones which alternate with one another on one boom; new calibration procedure YES, major modifications - add a second sprayer system; Either (1) Two herbicide concentrations in two spray tanks applied through two different spraying systems and booms OR (2) One carrier spray tank with two herbicide injection systems + two booms
Number of separate spraying systems needed and booms per sprayer 1 1 2
IR and BR zone widths equal Not applicable YES
Nozzle position over crop rows must be controlled to control IR and BR zone widths and herbicide rates NO YES
Nozzle type Flat fan spray nozzles Even spray nozzle tips
Number of different nozzle types per boom 1 type of nozzle tip 2 types of nozzle tips alternating with each other on boom to vary output volume, and thus herbicide rate 1 type of nozzle tip
Nozzles evenly spaced between one another on boom YES YES, but 2X as many nozzles as broadcast application YES, same number and spacing as broadcast application per boom, but 2X as many nozzles used in total
Relative sprayer modification cost of ZHA compared with broadcast spraying Not applicable Small start up cost for modifying existing sprayers;
Double number of nozzles on available boom and buy additional even nozzle tips, nozzle mountings, strainers, and hosing
Greatest start up cost of the 3 systems; Two separate spray systems OR One carrier spray tank with two separate herbicide concentrate injection systems into different booms for applying different rates of the same herbicide or different herbicides
PRE and POST herbicides YES (POST require more research)
Maximum boom height for crop clearance 25" to 50", depending upon nozzle tip and angle 25" for a 40 degree angle nozzle tips to create an 18" zone; boom must be lower for narrower zone widths with commercially available tips
Limitations for POST herbicide application NO POST herbicides limited to early crop growth < height of boom; spray period may be extended with nozzle tips < 40 degree angle allowing increased boom height
Overlap of spray patterns between adjacent nozzles across boom 1/8-1/16 th
Causes for application skips or errors 1) Skips between sprayer passes 1) Skips between sprayer passes;
2) Skips within a boom spray swath if boom height is not constant while spraying (more critical for ZHA than for broadcast application because of less spray pattern overlap)
For PRE herbicides, skips can be avoided by mounting sprayer on planter Not critical YES, low volume output nozzles may be needed to reduce water volume carried
For POST herbicides, skips can be prevented with stabilizer wheels or suspension systems for long booms Not critical YES
Weed control efficacy of reduced rate treatments < 1X rate, depends on herbicide, weed species, weed density, soil type, and climate ZHA has greater efficacy at lower total herbicide applied per area than comparable reduced rate broadcast applications; depends on herbicide, IR and BR rates, weed species, weed density, soil type, and environment
Weed control efficacy can be reduced by wind NO YES, Wind may shift IR zone off row, so that BR rates are less than required
Crop competition required for herbicidal weed control YES
Weed control efficacy reduced by drought YES, especially if crop canopy does not close and shade weeds
Weed control by reduced rate treatment is consistent & predictable year-to-year YES, depends on crop, herbicide, rate, weed, weed growth stage & environment dependent
Herbicide damage (phytotoxicity) to sprayed crop and herbicide residue carryover damaging rotational crops of broadcast application > ZHA YES, Depends on crop, crop variety or cultivar, herbicide, rate, & environment NO, because IR rate is decreased in ZHA, less crop damage expected compared with broadcast application; Depends on crop, crop variety or cultivar, herbicide, rate, & environment
Reduced herbicide spray drift hazard NO YES, because use rate of ZHA is less compared with reduced rate broadcast application
Reduced chance of herbicides in runoff water NO YES, because use rate of ZHA is less compared with reduced rate broadcast application

2004 Field Day Report

The Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station is the research arm of the
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources
at the University of Missouri-Columbia

Site maintained by people at AgEBB