Timing For A Harvest Aid In A Relay-Intercropped
Soybean Production System
Kelly Nelson
Research Agronomist |
Randall Smoot
Superintendent
Matt Jones
Research Specialist |
Light and moisture may be limiting for relay-intercropped soybean production. Therefore, wider
wheat row spacings have been utilized to allow relay-intercropped soybeans to intercept more
light. Relay-intercropped soybean production has been challenging in Northeast Missouri due to
dry weather in late June. Therefore, the use of glyphosate as a wheat harvest aid may reduce the
impact of wheat and weeds on relay-intercropped soybean grain yield. The objective of this
study was to evaluate the impact of a harvest aid timing on wheat and relay-intercropped
soybean grain yields.
‘Pioneer 25R37’ was planted at 110 lbs/a on 11 October 2002, 17 October 2003, and 8
November 2004 in 7.5 and 15 in. rows. Relay-intercropped soybean were planted in 15 in. rows
with a John Deere 7200 split-row planter on 23 April 2003, 29 April 2004, and 25 April 2005 at
180,000 seeds/a. Glyphosate was applied at 0.75 lb ae/a plus 17 lb/100 gal ammonium sulfate on
June 10, June 16, and June 24. All plots were harvested 7 July 2003, 28 June 2004, and 29 June
2005. Double-crop soybean were planted on the same day in 15 in. rows at 180,000 seeds/acre.
Data were subjected to ANOVA and means separated using Fisher’s protected LSD (p<0.05).
Glyphosate applied on 10 June 2003 or 2005 reduced wheat grain yield 20 to 33 bu/a (Table 1)
when compared to the untreated control; however, grain yield was not affected by the early
harvest aid treatment in 2004 which was due to earlier maturing wheat during this season. Grain
yield was not reduced when a harvest aid was applied on or after 16 June 2003, 2004, or 2005.
Soybean grain yield increased when a harvest aid was used in 2003 while no effect of the harvest
aid on soybean yield was observed in 2004 when compared to an untreated relay-intercropped
control. Wheat grain yield in 7.5 in. rows was 21 bu/a greater than 15 in. wheat in 2003, similar
to 15 in. wheat in 2004, and 6 bu/a greater than 15 in. wheat in 2005. Soybean grain yields in
2005 will be determined to evaluate the impact of the harvest aid on yield.
Table 1. The effect of glyphosate harvest aid timing on wheat grain yield in 2003, 2004, and 2005 in a double-crop and relayintercrop
production system, and soybean yield in a double-crop, relay-intercrop, and full-season production system in 2003 and 2004.
| Crop production system | Average harvest aid treatment date for 2003, 2004, and 2005 | Grain yield |
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Wheat row spacing | Soybean | Wheat | Soybean | Wheat | Soybean | Wheat |
| --------------------- bu/acre --------------------- |
| 7.5" | none | June 10 | 44 | ---a | 55 | ---a | 42 |
| 15" | relay-intercrop | June 10 | 26 | 18 | 49 | 46 | 37 |
| 7.5" | none | June 16 | 54 | --- | 54 | --- | 59 |
| 15" | relay-intercrop | June 16 | 42 | 16 | 53 | 43 | 46 |
| 7.5" | none | June 24 | 77 | --- | 53 | --- | 65 |
| 15" | relay-intercrop | June 24 | 53 | 16 | 49 | 45 | 56 |
| 7.5" | double-crop | Untreated | 76 | 10 | 53 | 22 | 63 |
| 15" | double-crop | Untreated | 55 | 9 | 54 | 23 | 57 |
| 15" | relay-intercrop | Untreated | 53 | 12 | 50 | 42 | 51 |
| None | full-season | Untreated | 0 | 37 | 0 | 49 | 0 |
| LSD (p<0.05) | 15 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 5 |
aTreatment was not included.
2005 Field Day Report