University of Missouri-Columbia
MU Greenley Memorial
Agricultural Experiment Station
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Map
Driving directions
Novelty, Knox County

Field Day
*Our next Field Day will be held August 7, 2008

Research

Faculty

Weather

Variety Testing

History

Contact us
Randall Smoot
P.O. Box 126
Novelty, MO 63460
Phone: 660-739-4410
Email: SmootR@missouri.edu

How Do MGA- And CIDR-Based Protocols Compare In Synchronizing Estrus In Replacement Beef Heifers?

line
D.J. Schafer
Graduate Student
D.J. Patterson
Associate Professor

We recently designed a study to compare estrous response, timing of AI and pregnancy rate resulting from AI among beef heifers that were presynchronized with MGA or CIDR inserts prior to GnRH and PG (Kojima et al., 2004; Figure 1). Heifers (n = 353) at three locations (location 1, n = 154; 2, n = 113; and 3, n = 85) were randomly assigned to one of two treatments by age and weight. The MGA Select-treated heifers (MGA; n = 175) were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/day) for 14 days, GnRH (100 ėg i.m. Cystorelin) was injected 12 days after MGA withdrawal, and PG (25 mg i.m. Lutalyse) was administered 7 d after GnRH. CIDRs (CIDR; n = 177) were inserted in heifers for 14 days, GnRH was injected 9 days after CIDR removal, and PG was administered 7 days after GnRH. CIDR-treated heifers received carrier without MGA on days that coincided with MGA feeding.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Substituting CIDR inserts for MGA in the MGA Select protocol in beef heifers. From Kojima et al. (2004).

Heifers were monitored for signs of behavioral estrus beginning the day PG was administered. AI was performed 12 hours after onset of estrus and recorded as day of AI (Day 0 = PG). Pregnancy rate to AI was determined by ultrasonography 40 days after AI. Estrous response did not differ (P > 0.10) between treatments. Peak AI occurred on day 3 for heifers in both treatments (CIDR 122/177, 69%; MGA 93/175, 53%), and distribution of AI was more highly synchronized (P < 0.05) among CIDR- than MGA-treated heifers. Pregnancy rate to AI was greater (P < 0.01) in CIDR- (112/177, 63%) than MGA-treated heifers (83/175, 47%), however, final pregnancy rate did not differ (P > 0.10) between treatments (Table 1). In summary, replacing feeding of MGA with CIDR inserts improved synchrony of estrus and pregnancy rate resulting from AI in replacement beef heifers (Kojima et al., 2004).

Table 1. Estrous response, AI pregnancy, and final pregnancy rates.
 Estrous responseAI pregnancy rateFinal pregnancy rate
CIDR154/177 (87 %)112/177 (63 %)a164/177 (93 %)
MGA147/175 (84 %)83/175 (47 %)b159/175 (91 %)
Total301/352 (86 %)195/352 (55 %)323/352 (92 %)
Difference+ 3 %a,b P = 0.01 + 16 %+ 2 %

From Kojima et al. (2004).

We have continued to collect data using this protocol in field demonstrations across Missouri. Results from the field demonstrations are included in Table 2. These data indicate that the 14-day CIDR protocol followed with the administration of GnRH on day 23 and prostaglandin on day 30 is a viable alternative for use in synchronizing estrus effectively in beef heifers.

Table 2. 14 day CIDR Results
HerdNo. Preg.Total No.Percentage
1274264
2507963
3355663
4264854
5497962
6314667
7244455
8+7111761
9294171
10+446766
11428152
12*+203067
Total48673067%

*MU Greenley Farm
+Heifers at these locations were inseminated at 72 hours after PG with GnRH at AI. No heat detection was performed.

2005 Field Day Report


The Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station is the research arm of the
College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources
at the University of Missouri-Columbia
Site maintained by people at AgEBB

agebb@missouri.edu