Winter-Annual Weed Management in Corn and Soybean
and the Impact on Soybean Cyst Nematode Egg
William G. Johnson
Associate Professor, Purdue University
Field research was conducted at Columbia and Novelty, MO to determine the impact of winterannual
weed management systems on corn and soybean grain yields, winter-annual weed control,
and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) egg population densities over the crop production cycle.
Corn grain yield was not affected by winter-annual weed management systems. Soybean grain
yield was not affected in by winter-weed management systems in 2001, but at Columbia in 2002
winter rye and Italian ryegrass reduced soybean grain yield 62 and 64%, respectively. Fallapplied
simazine (Princep) + tribenuron (Express) in corn and chlorimuron + sulfentrazone
(Canopy XL) in soybean controlled winter-annual weeds greater than 99%. Fall-overseeded
winter rye and Italian ryegrass in corn and overseeded Italian ryegrass in soybean controlled
winter weeds 66 to 86%. In the soybean studies, race 4 SCN population densities increased
(P=0.08) in the non-treated control and remained stable (P=0.55) with fall-applied chlorimuron +
sulfentrazone from fall 2001 to spring 2002 while SCN population densities were reduced
(P=0.06) with spring-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone from fall 2002 to spring 2003. In the
corn studies, none of the winter-annual weed management strategies reduced (P>0.22) race 2
SCN population densities except winter rye from fall 2001 to spring 2002 (P=0.05). This
research indicates that control of weed species considered to be weak alternative hosts for SCN
affected SCN population densities in some instances when race 4 SCN population densities were
high in a continuous soybean production system or race 2 SCN population densities were low in
a two-year corn production system.
No-till production systems were implemented to reduce erosion and conserve soil moisture and
have increased in the past ten years from 17 to more than 52 million acres (Anonymous 2000).
Adoption of no-till production practices has been accompanied by a concomitant increase in the
prevalence of winter-annual weeds such as henbit, purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum L.),
common chickweed, field pennycress, and others. Weeds can serve as alternative food sources
and trap plants for corn and soybean pests. Winter-annual weeds may serve as alternative hosts
of soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Niblack 1999; Venkatesh et al. 2000). Interactions between
herbicide treatments and SCN have been previously reported (Levene et al. 1998; Wong et al.
1993; Yang et al. 2002).
Winter rye (Blevins et al. 1971) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) (Jung et al. 1991;
Sollenberger et al. 1984) have been used as cover crops to reduce soil erosion (Griffith et al.
1986), to improve soil structure and organic matter, for weed suppression (Barnes and Putnam
1986), as winter-annual forage alternatives for tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) for
stockpile grazing (Bishop-Hurley and Kallenbach 2001), and to reduce nitrate leaching and alter
physical and chemical soil characteristics (Mitchell and Teel 1977). However, research
evaluating their potential to suppress winter-weed growth or SCN has not been reported. Winterannual
weeds have been more problematic in no-till production systems. Previous research has
primarily focused on summer-annual weeds as hosts of SCN, yet no research has evaluated the
interaction between winter-annual weed management systems and the impact on SCN population
densities. The objective of this research was to determine the impact of winter-annual weed
management systems on corn and soybean grain yields, winter-annual weed control, and the
subsequent impact on SCN egg population densities from fall to spring in the crop production
Materials and Methods:
General Methods. Field research was conducted in corn and soybean at the University of
Missouri Greenley Research Center at Novelty (40o 0' 45" N, 92o 12' 29 W) and Bradford
Research and Extension Center at Columbia (38o 53 ' 44" N, 92o 12' 39" W) in 2001 and 2002.
Herbicide treatments were applied with a CO2 pressurized backpack sprayer. Winter-annual
weed population density was determined in the non-treated control in November each year prior
to herbicide application. Winter-annual weeds and cover crops were controlled with a preplant
burndown of glyphosate at 0.75 lb ae/a plus diammonium sulfate at 17 lb/100 gallon while
summer-annual weeds were controlled with two sequential postemergence applications of
glyphosate at 0.75 lb ae/a plus diammonium sulfate at 17 lb/100 gallon or hand removal. Winter
rye was 20 to 35 inches tall and Italian ryegrass was 8 to 20 inches tall at the time of application.
Soybean study. The soybean sites had high initial egg population densities since continuous
soybeans or double-crop soybeans were grown frequently over the last decade at these sites.
SCN in the soybean sites at Novelty and Columbia was HG type 188.8.131.52.6.7 (Race 4) (Niblack et
al. 2002). ‘DK 38-52’ with moderate resistance to SCN races 4 and 13 (W. Parker, personal
communication) was planted in 30 inch wide rows at 140,000 seeds/a. Winter-annual weed
management treatments included: 1) a non-treated control, 2) spring, preemergence applied
chlorimuron at 0.036 lb ai/a + sulfentrazone at 0.2 lb ai/a (formulated as Canopy XL), 3) fallapplied
(early-November) chlorimuron at 0.036 lb ai/a + sulfentrazone at 0.2 lb ai/a, 4)
overseeded ryegrass at 25 lb/a, and 5) overseeded winter rye at 100 lb/a. Overseeded winter rye
and Italian ryegrass were broadcast applied with a hand spinner spreader at the R6 growth stage
to simulate seeding with an airplane. All treatments were applied to the same specific plots in
both 2001 and 2002 to determine a longer term impact of these treatments SCN egg population
densities and avoid possible confounding effects of previous treatments on winter annual weeds
Corn study. ‘Asgrow RX740 RR’ was planted in 76-cm wide rows at 69,000 seeds/ha. The
corn sites had low initial egg populations and the SCN at both sites was HG type 184.108.40.206 (Race 2)
(Niblack et al. 2002). Winter-annual weed management treatments included: 1) a non-treated
control, 2) spring preemerge applied atrazine at 2 lb ai/a, 3) fall-applied (early November)
simazine (Princep) at 1 lb ai/a + tribenuron (Express) at 0.016 lb ai/a plus crop oil concentrate at
1% v/v, 4) overseeded Italian ryegrass at 25 lb/a, and 5) overseeded winter rye at 100 lb/a.
Winter rye and Italian ryegrass treatments in corn was overseeded prior to the presence of black
layer in corn seed and were broadcast applied similar to the soybean study. All treatments were
applied to the same specific plots in both 2001 and 2002 to determine a longer-term impact of
these treatments on SCN egg population densities and avoid possible confounding effects of
previous treatments on winter annual weeds and SCN.
Data Collection and Statistical Analysis. Corn and soybean were harvested with a small-plot
harvester and moisture adjusted to 15 and 13% for corn and soybean, respectively. Soil samples
for SCN were collected following grain harvest in the fall, 2001 and 2002 at the time of
herbicide application. Spring soil samples were collected in the spring the subsequent year. Soil
was elutriated (Byrd 1976) and SCN eggs counted to determine differences in SCN population
densities in the fall and spring. Winter-annual weeds, winter rye, and Italian ryegrass were
harvested from one m2 quadrats in each plot, dried, and weighed at spring sampling timing for
SCN in 2003. All data were subjected to ANOVA and pooled over locations and years when
interactions were not observed. Crop grain yields, winter-annual weed, and winter-annual forage
biomass means were separated using Fisher’s Protected LSD at p<0.1 (SAS, 2005). SCN
population densities were analyzed within a treatment with t-tests to compare population
densities in the fall and spring. P-values are reported to indicate the magnitude of statistical
significance when differences occurred.
Results and Discussion:
Soybean study. The primary winter-annual weeds in the soybean trial were chickweed (8/ft2)
and henbit (8/ft2) at Columbia and henbit (14/ft2), chickweed and field pennycress (0.2/ft2) at
Novelty in November, 2002. Soybean grain yield was not affected by winter-annual weed
management systems at Novelty in 2001 and 2002 or Columbia in 2001 (Table 1). Soybean
seeded into Italian ryegrass or winter rye residue at Columbia in 2002 reduced grain yields 29
and 28 bu/acre, respectively, due to poor stand establishment (visual observation). Several
researchers have documented that this may be due to allelopathy, competition, poor seed to soil
contact, and cool, wet soils (Johnson et al. 1993).
Winter-annual weed biomass was assessed after two years initiation of winter-weed management
practices. Fall- and spring-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone were more effective in reducing
winter-annual weed biomass than winter rye. Spring-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone, fallapplied
chlorimuron + sulfentrazone, fall-overseeded ryegrass, and fall-overseeded winter rye
reduced winter-annual weed total dry weights 51, 99, 66, and 23%, respectively, in the spring,
Fall-overseeded winter rye and Italian ryegrass produced 19 and 57 g/m2, respectively, of forage
biomass in the spring 2003. Poor winter rye establishment resulted in lower than anticipated
forage biomass production and may reduce its potential usefulness for stockpile grazing during
the winter months.
SCN population densities were monitored in the non-treated check and the fall-applied
chlorimuron + sulfentrazone treatments during the 2001-2002 season. SCN population density
increased in the non-treated check from fall, 2001 to spring, 2002 (P=0.08) while there was no
change in SCN population density with chlorimuron + suflentrazone during this period. SCN
was monitored in all treatments from fall, 2002 to spring, 2003. Spring-applied chlorimuron +
sulfentrazone reduced SCN population density from fall, 2002 to spring 2003 (P=0.06); however,
none of the other treatments significantly reduced SCN population densities.
Corn study. Common chickweed (9/ft2) and henbit (5/ft2) were the primary winter-annual
weeds at Columbia and henbit (5/ft2) was the primary winter-annual weed at Novelty in the corn
study in November, 2002. Winter-annual weed management did not affect corn grain yield in
2001 or 2002 when compared to the non-treated control (Table 2). Winter rye, Italian ryegrass,
and fall-applied simazine + tribenuron were more effective in reducing spring weed biomass than
spring-applied atrazine. Spring-applied atrazine, fall-applied simazine + tribenuron, falloverseeded
ryegrass, and fall-overseeded winter rye reduced total dry weights of winter annuals
39, 100, 86, and 84%, respectively, in the spring, 2003. SCN population densities were low at
both corn sites and none of the treatments influenced SCN population density in either year
except winter rye from the fall, 2001 to spring, 2002 (P=0.05).
Among winter-annual weeds evaluated in our research, henbit and field pennycress have been
shown to serve as alternative hosts for race 3 SCN in previous research (Venkatesh et al. 2000).
However, in that study, SCN race 3 reproduction was considerably less on henbit and field
pennycress than either a SCN susceptible soybean variety or on purple deadnettle. Race 3 SCN
has been common in Missouri (Niblack et al., 1993). However, the fields evaluated in this
research have may have shifted populations due to extensive use of race 3 resistant soybean
cultivars in previous years. This may explain the increase in SCN egg population density from
spring to fall, 2002. In addition, there are no published reports to date concerning the host
compatibility of specific winter weeds for race 2 or 4 SCN. Our research indicates that if SCN
egg population densities are relatively high, such is in continuous soybean, management of weak
alternative weed hosts such as henbit and field pennycress with winter-annual weed management
systems such as spring-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone may show reduction or no increase
in SCN egg population density.
Creech et al. (2005) have shown that SCN race 3 reproduction can occur on purple deadnettle
following soybean harvest during a mild fall in southwest Indiana. This information combined
with the report from Venkatesh et al. (2000) suggests that management of winter-annual weed
complexes that contain purple deadnettle as a means of reducing SCN race 3 population density
should be considered in the southern cornbelt. However, this research indicates that other races
may need attention since use of race 3 resistant cultivars has been utilized throughout the
Midwest. Additional research needs to evaluate the impact of grazing winter-annual forages
such as winter rye and Italian ryegrass on winter-annual weeds.
The authors would like to thank Matthew Jones, Dana Harder, and Sattish Guttikonda for their
technical assistance on this research.
Anonymous. 2000. Conservation Technology Information Center National Crop Residue Management Survey.
Executive Summary, Conservation Technology Information Center, W. Lafayette, IN.
http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/CRM.html. Accessed July 28, 2005.
Barnes, J. P. and A. R. Putnam. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale
cereale). Weed Sci. 34:384-390.
Bishop-Hurley, G.J. and R.L. Kallenbach. 2001. The economics of grazing beef cows during winter. In Proc.
American Forage and Grassland council. 22-25 April 2001. Springdale, AR. Afgc, Georgetown, TX. pp. 274.
Blevins, R. L., D. Cook, and S. H. Phillips. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593.
Byrd Jr., D. W., K. R. Barker, H. Ferris, C. J. Nusbaum, W. E. Griffin, R. H. Small, and C. A.
Stone. 1976. Two semi-automatic elutriators for extracting nematodes and certain fungi
from soil. J. Nematol. 8:206-212.
Creech, J. E., W. G. Johnson, J. Faghihi, V. R. Ferris, and A. Westphal. 2005. First report of soybean cyst nematode
reproduction on purple deadnettle under field conditions. Online. Crop Management doi:10.1094/CM-2005-
Griffith, D. R., J. V. Mannering, and J. E. Box. 1986. Soil and moisture management with reduced tillage. In M.A.
Sprague and G.B. Triplett, eds. No-Tillage Agriculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York. P. 19-58.
Johnson, G. A., M. S. Defelice, and Z. R. Helsel. 1993. Cover crop management and weed control in corn (Zea
mays). Weed Technol. 7:425-430.
Jung, G. A., J. A. Shaffer, and J. L. Rosenberger. 1991. Sward dynamics and herbage nutritional value of alfalfaryegrass
mixtures. Agron. J. 83:786-794.
Levene, C.B., M.D.K. Owen, and G.L. Tylka. 1998. Response of soybean cyst nematode and soybeans (Glycine
max) to herbicides. Weed. Sci. 46: 264-270.
Mitchell, W. H. and M. R. Teel. 1977. Winter-annual cover crop for no-tillage corn production. Agron. J. 69:569-
Niblack, T.L. (ed.). 1999. Soybean cyst nematode management guide. North Central Soybean Research Program
Publication. Columbia: University of Missouri Printing Services. 20 pp.
Niblack, T. L., P. R. Arelli, G. R. Noel, C. H. Opperman, J. H. Orf, D. P. Schmitt, J. G. Shannon, and G. L. Tylka.
2002. A revised classification scheme for genetically diverse populations of Heterodera glycines J. of Nematol. 34:279-288.
Niblack, T. L., R. D. Heinz, G. S. Smith, and P. A. Donald. 1993. Distribution, density, and diversity of
Heterodera glycines in Missouri. J. of Nematol. 25:880-886.
SAS Institute. 2005. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Sollenberger, L. E., W. C. Templeton, Jr., and R. R. Hill, Jr. 1984. Orchardgrass and perennial ryegrass with applied
nitrogen and in mixtures with legumes. 2. Component contributions to dry matter and nitrogen harvests. Grass
Forage Sci. 39: 263-270.
Venkatesh, R., S.K. Harrison, and R.M. Riedel. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines)
in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156-160.
Wong, A.T.S., G. L. Tylka, and R. G. Hartzler. 1993. Effect of eight herbicides on the in vitro hatching of
Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 25: 578-584.
Yang, X., S.K. Harrison, and R.M. Riedel. 2002. Soybean (Glycine max) response to
glyphosate and soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol. 16:332-339.
Table 1. Influence of winter-annual weed management systems on soybean grain yield, winter-annual weed and forage biomass, and soybean cyst
nematode (SCN) population densities at Novelty and Columbia in 2001 and 2002.
|Weed management system
|SCN egg population
|Fall-seeded winter rye
|Fall-seeded Italian ryegrass
|Spring-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone
||0.036 + 0.2
|Fall-applied chlorimuron + sulfentrazone
||0.036 + 0.2
aP-values indicate the significance between fall and spring SCN population densities.
bAverage primary winter-annual weeds in November, 2002 at Columbia were common chickweed (8/ft2) and henbit (8/ft2) and at Novelty were
henbit (14/ft2), common chickweed, and field pennycress (0.2/ft2).
cData were not collected.
Table 2. Influence of winter-annual weed management systems on corn grain yield, winter-annual weed and forage biomass, and soybean cyst
nematode egg (SCN) population densities at Novelty and Columbia in 2001 and 2002.
|Weed management system
||SCN egg population
|Fall-seeded winter rye
|Fall-seeded Italian ryegrass
|Fall-applied simazine + tribenuron
||1 + 0.016
aP-values indicate the significance between fall and spring SCN population densities.
bAverage primary winter-annual weed in November, 2002 at Columbia was chickweed (9/ft2) and henbit (5/ft2) and at Novelty was henbit (5/ft2).
2006 Field Day Report