Evaluating the Need for Residual Herbicides with Glyphosate Tolerant Field Corn Treatments
D.E. Null and W.G. Johnson
December 28, 1999
Summary: The weather conditions of 1999 provided an adverse year to
study the results of the treatments in this study. Corn is normally
planted between April 20 and May 10 in northwest Missouri. The
excessively wet weather this spring delayed corn planting until May
28. This delayed planting time allowed for a moderate to heavy
establishment and growth of weeds prior to planting. The corn with
delayed burndown treatments was under considerable weed competition
pressure from the time it emerged. This resulted in corn stunting and
delayed tasseling.
Overall weed control, as rated on August 9 (end-of-season),
ranged from 78 to 96%. The poorest weed control was provided by
Roundup treatments without a residual herbicide. The only significant
Roundup rate response (78% vs. 88% control) was between the 16 ounces
and 32 ounces per treatment, Roundup treatments applied as a delayed
burndown followed by a mid-post Roundup treatment.
As a rule, treatment containing a residual herbicide provided
better grassy weed control at end-of-season than treatments without a
residual herbicide. Residual herbicides did not provide significantly
enhanced broadleaf weed control at end-of-season. Residual herbicide
treatments that contained either Dual or Harness, along with atrazine,
provided a higher level of grassy weed control than those containing
only atrazine.
Situation: Chemical weed control in field corn has
traditionally relied on soil applied, residual herbicides. All to
frequently, the most commonly used herbicides (atrazine and
metolachlor) show up in drinking water sources and become a public
health concern. Mechanical cultivation is frequently offered as a
method to reduce herbicide use but widespread use of this weed control
method increases soil erosion and sedimentation in Missouri's surface
waters.
The development and release of glyphosate tolerant (GT of RR)
corn varieties offer producers an opportunity to develop a corn weed
management program that has the potential to provide excellent,
economically viable weed control without a residual herbicide.
However, there is concern that the weed seedbank will build with late
emerging weeds.
There are still questions about optimum glyphosate rates. While
the recent price reduction of Roundup Ultra makes the costs of rate
increases less of a financial issue to producers, rates are still an
issue in environmental loading. Research conducted in 1998 at the
Hundley-Whaley farm suggests that good to excellent weed control can
be obtained with reduced glyphosate rates.
Objective: This research will have the following three objectives.
- To determine glyphosate application timing and use rate for
optimum weed control and crop yield of GO field corn and to compare
that to the performance of a commonly used standard weed control
program in field corn.
- To evaluate the need for a residual mid to late-post application
of atrazine or atrazine plus metolachor or acetochlor at reduced
rates, along with glyphosate, for control of late emerging weeds.
- To transfer the knowledge gained from the study to commercial corn
producers throughout northwest Missouri.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on no-till field
corn following 1998 soybeans. Planting date was planned for the first
week in May, 1999 but, due to excessive spring rainfall the actual
planting date was May 28. Planting was done with a John Deere vacuum
planter at the rate of 25,500 seeds per acre. The corn variety was
DeKalb DK626RR.
Rainfall through the season could be characterized by excessively
wet through June then drought. Only 0.95 inch of rain was recorded in
July. August received 1.13 inches of rainfall. Summer temperatures
were typical. One excessively hot period occurred from July 24
through July 30 where daytime highs were 99 to 103 degrees Fahrenheit.
This was the period for pollination of the corn treatments that had
received a pre-emergence burndown herbicide treatment.
The study location was located on east Fairchild Road at the
Hundley-Whaley farm. The soil is a Grundy silt loam with 3% organic
matter. Fertilizer was broadcast applied, with a Gandy Ezee Flow
fertilizer applicator, at the rate of 180-0-90 immediately after
planting. The nitrogen source was ammonium nitrate.
Weed pressure ranged from moderate to heavy for the following
predominant weed species: - Marestail
- Giant foxtail
- Cocklebur
- Wild sunflower
Other miscellaneous weeds present in the study were little barley,
ivyleaf morningglory, and corn gromwell with variable pressure.
The study was designed as a randomized complete block with six
replications. It consisted of nineteen treatments. One treatment was
an untreated weedy check and one was a standard pre-emergence
Gramoxone plus Bicep followed by Marksman applied mid-post (6-8" tall
corn) treatment. The other seventeen treatments consisted of
glyphosate applied at various times and rates, with and without
atrazine or atrazine plus metolachlor or acetochlor for residual weed
control. Applications timings were:
- At planting - a pre-emergence glyphosate burndown treatment
followed by either a mid-post glyphosate treatment (6-8" tall corn),
with and without atrazine or atrazine plus metolachlor, or a mid-post
treatment of glyphosate and a late, late post (16-20" corn) glyphosate
treatment.
- A delayed glyphosate burndown (2-4" tall corn) treatment
followed by a late post glyphosate treatment (10-12" corn) with and
without atrazine or atrazine plus acetochlor.
Roundup Ultra was the source of glyphosate. It was applied at
rates ranging from 16 to 32 ounces of product at each application.
Ammonium sulfate at the rate of 17 pounds/100 gallons of spray
solution was mixed with all Roundup treatments. All applications were
made with 20 GPA of spray solution.
Evaluations included the recording of weed pressure, by species,
prior to each glyphosate application; a visual evaluations of weed
control 10-14 days following each herbicide application and an
"end-of-season" (August 9) visual evaluation for treatment efficacy.
The evaluation of weed pressure prior to treatment should encourage
scouting and the "end-of-season" evaluation should provide indications
of weed seed production that would build seed bank. Crop yields were
taken. A planned economic analysis of results was not done due to
very poor yields resulting from a mid and late summer drought in
Gentry county.
Extension of Results: The study was discussed at the 1999
Hundley-Whaley farm field day on September 9, 1999. Approximately 650
people stopped by this study to hear what was being done. In
addition, results of the test will be distributed to producers and
dealers during 2000 as follows:
| Outlet |
Method |
Number (Impact) |
|
News media |
Ask the Cropman Column - a
weekly column |
7 area newspapers and 5
radio stations |
|
Newsletter |
Agronomy in Missouri's
Northwest |
2000 producers and dealers in
northwest Missouri |
|
Internet |
Include in Hundley-Whaley
Home page |
International availability |
|
Meetings |
Presentation at NW Mo. Corn
Producers Meeting and other
producer meetings |
450 producers and dealers at
8 meetings |
|
Conference |
Presentation at Northwest
Mo. CCA training |
100 Certified Crop Advisors |
Treatment List
|
Roundup Rates in ounces of product/acre
(atrazine, metolachlor & acetochlor rates given below) |
|
Treatment |
Burndown |
2-4" Corn |
6-8" Corn |
10-12" Corn |
16-20" Corn |
|
1 |
16 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
16 |
0 |
16 +atrazine |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
16 |
0 |
16+atrazine+
metolachlor |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
16 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16 |
|
5 |
24 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
|
6 |
24 |
0 |
24+atrazine |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
24 |
0 |
24 +atrazine+
metolachlor |
0 |
0 |
|
8 |
24 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
24 |
|
9 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16+atrazine |
0 |
|
11 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16+atrazine+
acetochlor |
0 |
|
12 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
|
13 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
24+atrazine |
0 |
|
14 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
24+atrazine+
acetochlor |
|
15 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
|
16 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
32+atrazine |
0 |
|
17 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
32+atrazine+
acetochlor |
0 |
|
18 |
Standard pre Gramoxone plus BiCep II f.b. mid-post Marksman treatment |
|
19 |
Standard weedy check |
Atrazine rate to be 1 pound a.i./acre
Metolachlor rate to be 1 pound a.i./acre
Acetochlor rate to be 0.9 pound a.i./acre
Discussion of Experimental Results: Emergence of corn seedlings
occurred within one week of planting. No stand counts were obtained
but the stand appeared to be adequate and uniform.
Treatments receiving delayed burndown herbicides (post 2-4" corn) were
under stress early in the study. Notes taken on June 14, a little
over two weeks after planting, showed the corn in these treatments to
be shorter and less robust than where a pre-emergence burndown
treatment was applied. Crop growth reduction ratings were taken on
June 17 (19DAP) and the ten delayed burndown treatments showed crop
growth reductions (biomass reduction estimates) of from 36-45%. This
compared to no crop growth reduction for the nine treatments receiving
a pre-emergence burndown treatment. The delayed burndown treatments
showed nitrogen deficiency type symptoms despite the heavy rate of
nitrogen applied at planting time.
There was no apparent crop injury from any of the Roundup plus
residual herbicide post-emergence treatments.
All treatments provided 100% control of wild sunflower at the
end-of-season rating (August 9). However, there was a difference in
giant foxtail and cocklebur control. The table below shows results of
selected treatments.
Table 1
Percent Giant Foxtail and Cocklebur Control (Aug 9, rating) Provided by Roundup and
Roundup Tank Mixes |
|
Treatment |
GFT |
Cklb |
|
Pre Rup fb Epost Rup (T1) |
61 |
91 |
Pre Rup fb Epost Rup +
atrazine (T2) |
87 |
93 |
Pre Rup fb Epost Rup +
atrazine + Dual (T3) |
97 |
93 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
7 |
20 |
Table 2
Percent Giant Foxtail Control (Aug 9) Provided by Roundup and Roundup Tank Mixes
at Two Roundup Rates |
|
Treatment |
Low Rate Roundup (16 oz) |
High Rate Roundup (24 oz) |
|
Roundup alone (T2 &6) |
61 |
76 |
|
Roundup + atrazine (T3&7) |
87 |
85 |
Roundup + atrazine + Dual II
Magnum (T4&8) |
97 |
94 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
7 |
The table below shows that there was no significant difference in weed
control between two and three applications of Roundup, each applied at
16 ounces/acre.
Table 3
Overall Weed Control at "end-of season" as Influenced by
Number of 1 pint Roundup Applications |
|
Treatment |
% Weed Control |
|
Pre Rup f/b M-post Rup (Treatment 2) |
92 |
Pre Rup f/b M-post Rup f/b L-post Rup
(Treatment 6) |
95 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
6 |
The best overall "end of season" weed control (96%) was provided by
the standard Gramoxone + Bicep followed by Marksman treatment (T19)
and the multiple Roundup application (T6).
The effect of delaying the first Roundup application from a
pre-emergence to a 2-4" corn, very early post did have an adverse
effect upon both early and late growth of the corn. The delayed
application in a normal season might not have been evident but due to
the delay in planting we had 2-4" corn competing with 4-8" giant
foxtail. Measurements were taken of corn height, 45 days after
planting. The date for initiation of tasseling was also recorded.
The table below gives an indication of the effect of early weed
competition upon corn eight and tasseling.
Table 4
|
Effect of Weed Control Treatment on Corn Height and Tasseling |
|
Treatment |
Inches of height of corn |
Days to tassel |
Standard Gramoxone + Bicep
f/b Marksman (T19) |
50" |
60 |
Pre f/b mid-post Roundup,
each at 24 oz/acre (T6) |
53 |
60 |
Epost f/b mid-post Roundup,
each at 24 oz/acre (T13) |
37 |
66 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
6 |
2 |
Table 5
End-of Season Giant Foxtail Control Provided by 16 Ounce Roundup Rates
in Selected Treatments |
|
Treatment |
% GFT Control |
|
Pre Roundup f/b E-post Roundup (T2) |
61 |
Pre Roundup f/b E-post Roundup + Atrazine
+ Dual (T4) |
97 |
Pre Roundup f/b E-post Roundup f/b L-post
Roundup (T5) |
95 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
7 |
The 45 DAP corn height for all nine of the pre-emergence burn down
treatments ranged from 50 to 55 inches. The height of the ten delayed
burn-down treatments ranged from 34 to 39 inches.
The "days to tassel" for the nine pre-emergence burn down treatments
ranged from 59 to 60 days. The "days to tassel" for the ten delayed
burn-down treatments ranged from 64 to 68 days after planting.
Corn yields were taken on October 19. Corn yields were severely
affected by the summer drought. All treatments yielded under 40
bushels/acre and there was considerable variation in treatment yields.
No meaningful data on yields could be reported.
Conclusion: The data that shows the severe reduction in early
season crop growth due to delayed burndown treatments can be of
benefit to producers. It indicates that corn growth is reduced by
early season weed competition, even if that competition is eliminated
within two weeks following corn emergence (Table 4). University
research has repeatedly shown that if corn appears to be stunted and N
deficient early in the year (by 3-6 WAP) due to weed interference,
significant yield reductions will occur.
Tasseling date was significantly retarded in the delayed burndown
treatments. In a normal year, if tasseling is delayed, corn
pollination is attempted in hotter, drier weather. This generally
results in reduced corn yields.
The data also suggests that a late post applications of Roundup will
be required for giant foxtail control if no residual herbicide is
applied early post-emergence (Table 5). It also suggests that
residual herbicides used at lower than labeled use rates, applied
early-post, is beneficial in reducing end-of-season grassy weed
pressure when compared to post treatments without the residual
herbicide (Table 2).
|