Asparagus Cultivar Evaluation
Andrew L. Thomas, Southwest Research Center, Mt. Vernon
Lewis Jett, Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri, Columbia
Asparagus is a high-value vegetable that is very well-suited to small-scale production in
Missouri. If quality is good, both pre-picked and you-pick operations can be successful and
profitable, with potential yields of 3,000 lbs. per acre possible. That said, it is difficult to
understand why we do not have more asparagus growers in Missouri, especially when fresh,
locally-grown asparagus is eagerly sought by consumers and tastes far superior to anything
trucked in from California.
Probably the two main challenges for local growers are weed control and the need to
irrigate for optimum yields. Information on which asparagus cultivars are best suited to our
growing conditions is also lacking. A number of new asparagus cultivars have been released over
the last 20 years, but they have not been extensively evaluated in the Midwest.
An asparagus planting of 0.7 acre was established at the Southwest Center in 1999. Seed
from eleven modern asparagus cultivars (Table 1) was sown in the greenhouse on March 31,
1999. After deep plowing, liming, fertilizing, and disking the soil, the seedlings were
transplanted into the field on June 7 and 25, 1999. Experimental plots consisted of three parallel
15-ft rows containing 12 plants per row, with two replicated plots per cultivar. Rows were 5 ft
apart and separated lengthwise by alleys of 3.5 ft. Additional asparagus experiments (not
described here) were also established at the same time within and among this cultivar evaluation
so that it was spread out and interspersed over a large plantation area in a completely randomized
design.
Harvest data were collected from all 36 plants per plot. The plots were allowed to become
very well-established before initiating harvest during their fourth season in 2002, and continuing
through 2004. Harvests were conducted April 15- May 1, 2002; April 15 - May 24, 2003; and
April 9 - May 21, 2004. Spears were hand-harvested generally every two days during the harvest
period, counted, weighed, and evaluated for quality. A statistical analysis was conducted to
compare yields among the 11 cultivars.
Table 1 presents data on plot yields, including total weight and number of spears, as well
as the calculated average weight per spear averaged over the 3-year trial. The cultivar ‘Jersey
Deluxe’ was the overall 3-year champion, both in terms of total weight per plot and total number
of spears. However, Jersey Deluxe’s average weight per spear was much lower than many other
cultivars. The cultivar ‘Apollo’ produced the largest spears with an average of 10.6 g for all three
years and 11.3 g during 2003 and 2004.
Statistically, we did not find true differences in total spear weight among cultivars, but
did detect significant differences in number of spears per cultivar and average weight per spear.
An interesting trend observed was that the cultivars producing the greater number of spears
tended to produce smaller spears, and conversely, cultivars producing fewer spears were larger.
Yields in 2002 were poor because of a serious spring drought (we normally set up our
irrigation system after spring harvest and were not well-prepared for a spring drought). The 2003
and 2004 yields, however, were excellent. Table 2 provides details on yields (converted to a
pound per acre basis) of the eleven cultivars.
Including the poor 2002 yield data, the total calculated yield per acre of our best cultivar
(Jersey Deluxe) was 1,788 lbs/acre. However, if we look only at 2003 and 2004 yields (realizing
how important spring moisture is), our total yield was much better at 2,265 lbs/acre. At $3.00 per
pound, this cultivar could potentially gross $6,795 annually per acre! I suspect that many
growers could do quite a bit better than that as they would be focused solely on optimum
production rather than on the various demands of the research trials that we were conducting.
We hope these results can assist potential asparagus growers, from back-yard gardeners
to commercial growers, in choosing which asparagus cultivars to plant. But keep in mind that
this was a relatively small study at a single location.
Furthermore, other important factors such as insect and disease resistance, flavor,
tenderness, and earliness are not accounted for here. We would usually recommend planting
more than one cultivar, especially on a large scale, to ensure genetic diversity in any type of
horticultural planting.
Table 1. Mean annual plot* yields of 11 asparagus cultivars at Southwest Center, 2002-2004
| Cultivar |
Total wt
per plot (kg) |
Number of
spears |
Mean wt
per spear (g) |
| Jersey Deluxe |
4.19 |
472 |
8.8 |
| Jersey Giant |
3.97 |
410 |
9.2 |
| NJ857 |
3.91 |
438 |
8.7 |
| Apollo |
3.75 |
347 |
10.6 |
| NJ 931 |
3.56 |
342 |
10.2 |
| UC 157 |
3.53 |
455 |
8.0 |
| Guelph Millennium |
3.38 |
337 |
9.6 |
| Jersey Supreme |
3.33 |
355 |
9.0 |
| Atlas |
3.17 |
352 |
8.8 |
| Jersey Gem |
2.98 |
351 |
8.0 |
| NJ855 |
2.45 |
260 |
9.0 |
| *Plots were 225 ft2 containing
36 plants |
Table 2. Calculated* yield per acre (lb/acre) of 11 asparagus cultivars at Southwest Center, 2002-2004
| Cultivar |
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
3-year
Mean
|
| Jersey Deluxe |
834
|
2700
|
1830
|
1788
|
| Jersey Giant |
685
|
2040
|
2352
|
1692
|
| NJ857 |
796
|
2500
|
1715
|
1670
|
| Apollo |
730
|
1868
|
2200
|
1599
|
| NJ 931 |
805
|
2227
|
1525
|
1519
|
| UC 157 |
1216
|
1716
|
1590
|
1508
|
| Guelph Millennium |
376
|
1857
|
2091
|
1441
|
| Jersey Supreme |
576
|
1948
|
1743
|
1422
|
| Atlas |
634
|
1589
|
1835
|
1353
|
| Jersey Gem |
551
|
1668
|
1591
|
1270
|
| NJ855 |
386
|
1372
|
1377
|
1045
|
| Mean |
690
|
1953
|
1804
|
1482
|
| *Based on plot size of 225 ft2
containing 36 plants |
|