| Field
of Science |
FY
’01 $ |
| Economics |
5,905,163 |
| Nutrition/Metabolism |
5,025,419 |
| Molecular
Biology |
4,140,274 |
| Physiology |
3,905,444 |
| Genetics |
3,646,621 |
| Whole
Systems Biology |
3,503,591 |
| Ecology |
2,438,263 |
| Biochemistry |
2,163,920 |
| Entomology |
1,322,607 |
| Sociology |
1,146,461 |
| Engineering |
1,063,465 |
| Developmental
Biology |
963,631 |
| Cellular
Biology |
852,383 |
| Nematology |
811,772 |
| Weed
Science |
747,248 |
| Sensory
Science |
674,578 |
| Immunology |
632,623 |
| Chemistry |
562,827 |
| Bacteriology |
483,432 |
| Pedology |
461,182 |
| Meteorology/Climatology |
383,556 |
| Math/Computer
Science |
358,650 |
| Limology |
333,238 |
| Pathology |
328,549 |
| Mycology |
265,614 |
| Statistics |
240,799 |
| Hydrology |
221,968 |
| Physics |
170,217 |
| Toxicology |
165,676 |
| Misc
Microbiology |
141,132 |
| Virology |
130,538 |
| Geology |
73,066 |
| Mineralology |
72,790 |
| Psychology |
19,155 |
| Pharamcology |
9,418 |
| Education |
2,111 |
These
data report over $43 M in total research expenditures from CAFNR
as submitted to USDA’s CRIS reporting system for federal FY01.
These include all salary, operating, and equipment purchases for
research from state, federal, and grant sources of funding. |
Is
CAFNR’s Research Effort
Ready for Tomorrow?
Ever wonder
where CAFNR spends it’s time and resources? Have you debated
with friends and colleagues the direction and focus of our research?
As a public land-grant university, and part of the nation-wide
network of agricultural research efforts, we serve many masters.
We are accountable to local, state and federal government, as
well as citizens, faculty, and staff. Illustrated on this page
is a break-out by field of science of the $43M we expended on
research in federal FY01. [These and other data are available
from the federal CRIS system http://cristel.csrees.usda.gov].
The data
reveal that CAFNR has a broad portfolio of programs and faculty,
certainly more diverse than most of us might realize. Many of
these are nationally known and competitive for funding among peers
across the nation. Others are local, with support from individual
towns, counties or economic communities. Taken as a whole, they
create the building blocks for a notable research enterprise,
one that ranks 16th nationally among all colleges of agriculture
for research expenditures by the NSF.
Our future
success, however, is probably not as dependent upon size or scope
as it is on focus. Are we poised for the future problems of agriculture,
food, and natural resources? Or the past? And, who can we trust
to distinguish between the two? I urge you to read and become
involved in this important topic. The most compelling of recent
reports is that of the National Academy in a recent volume entitled,
Frontiers in Agricultural Research: Food, Health, Environment
and Community. If you haven’t seen it, an excellent
four-page summary is available for downloading at:
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/banr/frontiers
_ag_research _summary.pdf
The entire report can be purchased or viewed on-line at: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084946/html
Not surprisingly,
the National Academies’ Board on Agriculture and Natural
Resources calls for greater attention to the quality of products
and socio/environ/econ impacts of agriculture rather than agricultural
production itself. In fact, in my short career in agriculture,
this has always been the message to the agricultural sciences.
But, I’ve also observed that most people don’t change
unless they have to. During these times of limited budgets and
tough choices, we all are being called to transform, realign,
and find new ways to go about our business. As difficult as this
process is, my hope is that it’s preparing us for the future.
Look across
your own efforts and those of the College. Let me know how you
think our research assets stack against tomorrow’s challenges.
Regards, John
|